Thursday, July 9, 2009

Understanding the California Budget Crisis

Alaskan Dude

Living beyond your means is a sure way to guarantee financial ruin. Today, millions are dealing with the fallout from artificially-inflated real estate values and accessible, unsecured credit. For those recently (or still) in this situation, a number of temporary solutions were once readily available - refinancing, taking out home equity lines, taking on additional credit cards - but, these quick fixes all had one thing in common: they only delayed the inevitable. But it’s one thing for an individual to act irresponsibly, and quite another for an entire state.

The State of California resembles a classic spendthrift; the world’s 8th largest economy, was long characterized by its numerous economic opportunities, inviting business climate, and bustling real estate industries. But, the state was also regularly in deficit for the last several decades. This did not seem to matter. The state continued to borrow against future revenue, in order to finance its budget requirements - much like an individual would borrow against the speculative increase in their home’s value to pay for existing bills. The way they were able to do this, was by the sale of short-term notes for cash (similar to bonds).

The logic behind these actions was that growth was always expected: businesses were going to continue to grow, unemployment would be always be low, and income tax revenues were going to continue to increase. Most importantly, existing and new debt would always be recouped by future profits. If this sounds familiar, it probably is. For Californians that witnessed their home values skyrocketing between 2002-2006, taking out new loans for motorcycles and boats, or for kitchen remodels or expensive vacations almost made since, even if what you earned did not justify these costs. Your house was a passive (almost magical) source of money from which everything would one day be paid off, and everything would once again be right with the universe

What Happened?

Starting with the real estate market slumping in 2007, the situation quickly become grim for the state with the credit and financial markets meltdown in 2008. Shortly thereafter, the State’s credit rating was reduced. Due to a lack of confidence in the short-term notes, their sales have slowed down considerably. And, in the face of a devaluing dollar and massive trade deficits, the Obama administration denied the state’s request to federally-back the state notes, citing that states are responsible for solving their own budgetary problems.

California’s general fund has also experienced sharp declines in tax revenue. Income tax revenues have dropped considerably since 2007; 2009 receipts alone, are expected to be over $1B less than the pre-year prediction - which was already lower than normal. The state is also experiencing (on average) $200 Million less per month from Sales and Use Tax revenues from pre-year forecasts. Also, the State has the nation’s highest level of unemployment at 11.5% (68,900 jobs were lost in May 2009 alone) - which is also a 30-yr high for CA. This has exacerbated existing budget issues, with a higher-than-normal amount of unemployment payments being dispersed to a larger non-working population.

The condition of the state is analogous to an individual simultaneously experiencing a reduced income, either because of mandatory vacations, or hour cuts (or even becoming occasionally-employed), and an increase in their expenses (an adjustable rate mortgage, increased credit card APRs, etc). Not surprisingly, this has increasingly become the norm for many California citizens. The situation is at the intersection of circumstance and lackluster planning. Looking back at the last decade of California’s dynamic economy, we can now all see that things really seemed too good to be true, because, in fact, they were.

What This Means

Currently the state is facing a shortfall of over $27 billion, and this deficit is estimated to increase to $40 billion by the end of 2010.To put this in perspective, $27 billion is more than ¼ of the state’s general fund. Or rather, the state only has ¾ of the funds necessary to run at full capacity.

When the state legislature met in May to discuss wide-reaching budgetary cuts, it created a division among party lines: Republicans agreed to lower the income of state employees; Democrats strove to increase fees for select goods and services (cigarettes, oil wells). Governor Schwarzenegger, however, moved to generate revenue by borrowing from local governments. Because the parties involved at the state legislature were unable to come to a resolution, Governor Schwarzenegger has declared a Fiscal State of Emergency. What this means is that if a deficit is not solved within 45 days, the state legislature cannot act on other bills until this is resolved - in short, the state must figure out a way to substantially reduce this deficit, and/or find new money.

Unlike people, states can’t simply file for some type of bankruptcy protection. If the state were to default on its creditors, it will be in an exponentially worse situation. The state will lose a sizable source of regular revenue, in that investors would no longer want to invest here. Courting investors may not be the solution for the immediate crises, it will inevitably be required, should the state get back on track.

To make matters worse California’s labor market, does not show signs of having hit rock bottom. Forecasts by Beacon Economics, the UCLA Anderson School and Chapman University estimate that unemployment may near 13% by year’s end; and according to Esmael Adibi (Chapman), the recession, “…at the state level should end by mid-2010, when job creation will start.”

How the State is Coping:

Because of the grim diagnosis, the state will be forced to enact a number of the cuts in an effort to shrink the deficit. There will also be a number of new and increased taxes that will be levied on citizens, to help bare the cost. Some of the more noted cuts and taxes include:

- Mandatory furloughs for many state employees Feb 2009 - June 2010. This is estimated to save $1.3 Billion. (The partial government shutdown also will lead to a third furlough day for 235,000 state employees, bringing their total pay cut this year to about 14%).

- Additionally, layoffs, reductions and other efficiencies will be instituted in an effort to cut payroll by 10%. This is estimated to amount to as many as 60,000 state jobs.

- As of April 1, 2009 Sales tax was increased by 1%.

- As of July 2, 2009 the State began issuing IOUs for state tax refund payments.

- The Vehicle License Fee (VLF) rate increased from 0.65 percent to 1.15 percent from May 19, 2009, to June 30, 2011.

- More than $3 B in cuts to public education.

- Nearly $1 B in cuts to public health care.

Prospective Cuts:

- As many as 200 of California's 279 State Parks may be closed.

- A suspension of Cal Grants and Cal Works – state programs that provide health and education services to low-income families.

The Takeaway:

The type of problems facing California lawmakers are reminiscent of those presently faced by millions of Americans and their households. Similarly, the state’s response is largely a reaction to market conditions; the same can be said about so many Americans, in that we only fix what is broken. Expense management is perhaps the most important lesson learned on one’s way to financial maturity, and unfortunately for so many it usually only comes from past failures. There are a number of lessons to be learned at the administrative level, and I think I speak for most Californians when I say that I hope our leaders are wise enough to find a solution that enables our getting out of this situation, but also makes it more difficult for the state to get in this type of a mess in the foreseeable future.

Sources:

http://www.latimes.com/features/health/medicine/la-ed-budget8-2009jun08,0,7552895.story

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/02/ca-assembly-speaker-schwa_n_224673.html

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-california-jobless20-2009jun20,0,3863292.story

http://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/stories/2009/06/29/daily29.html


Read more about Understanding the California Budget Crisis…



Wednesday, July 8, 2009

The Ascent of Money


Beginning tonight, public television stations in the United States will broadcast a four-part series from economist and historian Niall Ferguson, The Ascent of Money. This is an expanded version of a documentary that first aired in January.

Here’s a description of The Ascent of Money from the official site:

For millions of people, the recession has generated a thirst for knowledge about how our global economic system really works, especially when so many financial experts seem to be equally baffled. In THE ASCENT OF MONEY, economist, author and historian Ferguson offers insight into these questions by taking viewers step-by-step through the milestones of the financial history that created this system, visiting the locations where key events took place and poring over actual ledgers and documents — such as the first publicly traded share of a company — that would change human history.

Ferguson maintains that the history of money is indeed at the core of our human history, with economic strength determining political dominance, wars fought to create wealth and individual financial barons determining the fates of millions.

Apparently, PBS will also be posting each episode online for free. The first installment, “From Bullion to Bubbles”, is already available. I watched it this morning. It’s fascinating.

Geekiness: For 20+ years (since high school), I’ve wanted to know why most of the world uses Arabic numerals. Nobody has ever been able to give me an answer. In this show, Ferguson explains the source of this standard!

Ferguson suggests that financial history is the fundamental background to all history. “From Mesopotamia right down to day, the ascent of Money has been an indispensable part of the ascent of Man,” he says, adding: “Without the invention of credit, the entire economic history of our world would have been impossible.”

What I find especially interesting about The Ascent of Money is the way in which it ties together bits of history that are largely unrelated in my mind. It’s sort of like Connections, but solely about money. (I knew some of these things from The Four Pillars of Investing, but The Ascent of Money paints a broader picture.)

The first part of The Ascent of Money was interesting enough that I plan to watch the other three episodes as they’re made available online. To be honest, though, I felt like the narrative wandered at times. I’m curious if the original two-hour version (already available on DVD) might not be more effective.

If you’re interested in this show, you can check the PBS website to see when it airs on your local public television station. (Here in Portland, the four parts air Wednesday nights at 9pm starting today.) You might also try to watch some similar shows from the past, including:

Did anyone catch The Ascent of Money when the original version was broadcast in January? What did you think? And am I the only one around here fascinated by the history of money?

—
Related Articles at Get Rich Slowly:

  • No related posts


Read more about The Ascent of Money…



When Money DOES Buy Happiness


Money can’t buy happiness. Or can it? The TierneyLab blog from The New York Times recently conducted an informal survey. Based on Spent: Sex, Evolution, and Consumer Behavior, a new book from Dr. Geoffrey Miller, readers were invited to:

List the ten most expensive things (products, services or experiences) that you have ever paid for (including houses, cars, university degrees, marriage ceremonies, divorce settlements and taxes). Then, list the ten items that you have ever bought that gave you the most happiness. Count how many items appear on both lists.

Yesterday’s TierneyLab column examined the responses. The results are fascinating. Things appearing much more often on ‘expensive’ lists than ‘happy’ lists include:

  • children
  • marriage ceremonies
  • divorces
  • taxes
  • most cars
  • boats

Items that were on far more ‘happy’ lists than ‘expensive’ lists included:

  • meals with friends
  • alcohol
  • bicycles
  • pets
  • hobbies
  • adult education
  • church and charity
  • books, music, artwork
  • quality beds

And, finally, there was some overlap where things were both expensive and fulfilling. These include:

  • houses
  • higher education
  • travel
  • electronics
  • certain vehicles

Obviously, these results are not scientific in any way. But they’re interesting.

For myself, I was hard pressed to list ten items on each side. I just listed six or seven. Believe it or not, my Mini Cooper makes both lists. So does our current home. (If I had paid for college, that would have definitely made both lists; I was fortunate to attend on scholarship.) Other than that, though, there’s not a clear relationship between money spent and happiness received.

Dr. Miller offered a brief analysis of the survey results, noting a handful of trends, including:

  • For many, there is an overlap between expensive purchases and happiness.
  • Many people — including myself — find that paying for experiences is more likely to bring happiness than buying physical Stuff.
  • Many commenters emphasized the value of thrift in daily life so they could afford to spend on the things that mattered.
  • Some people noted that the act of saving money for the future brings them happiness.

If you find this topic as interesting as I do, I recommend you read the full post, which contains a lot of additional information and a fuller analysis. Also, the comments on the article are quite good.

[TierneyLab at The New York Times: When money buys happiness, via e-mail from Robin B.]

—
Related Articles at Get Rich Slowly:


Read more about When Money DOES Buy Happiness…



Rules of Civility & Decent Behavior | Live Like Washington

You behave…

Lil' George and his posse

Human beings admire those with dignity and grace. No matter how far the public taste strays into an ocean of trash, social graces are a braided rope thrown from the shores of home.

In saying this, I don’t mean that we should all go to finishing school to prepare for our high society coming-out parties before Lindsay Lohan pulls us beneath the waves like the Creature from the Black Lagoon. No, I’m talking about how we conduct ourselves. If we want to be treated with respect, it wouldn’t hurt to do as George Washington did. He studied “Rules of Civility and Decent Behavior in Company and Conversation.” He transcribed these 110 rules to live by when he was a boy.

And you’re… how old? Get with the program and live better. Use payday loans and unsecured loans responsibly, too. It’s all part of being dignified.

He was the Father of Our Country

David Brooks writes in the New York Times op-ed piece “In Search of Dignity” that Washington’s rules of civility were difficult to follow, but he worked hard to cultivate them throughout his life. Historian Gordon Wood recognizes the efforts of America’s first president when he writes that “Washington became a great man and was acclaimed as a classical hero because of the way he conducted himself during times of temptation. It was his moral character that set him off from other men.” ... click here to read the rest of the article titled "Rules of Civility & Decent Behavior | Live Like Washington"

Friday, July 3, 2009

Still Having Problems With TIAA-Cref? Tell Us Now

On July 20, TIAA-Cref will be holding its annual participant meeting. There is an effort underway to encourage the company to be more socially responsible and accountable to its customers, and representatives will be attending the meeting to bring any common problems directly to the board’s attention.

Are you having customer service problems with TIAA-Cref? Please see the instructions below. Here are my past notable experiences with the company.

In March 2006, I scheduled a transfer from ING Direct to create my first SEP IRA on April 7, leaving enough time for the account to be created before the tax deadline. I noticed the problem the day after the account should have been created. The company did not create the account nor did they deduct funds from my ING account. There was still a week before the tax deadline, so I was not yet up in arms.

By April 18, 2006, the TIAA-Cref account had been created but they still did not deduct my funds. This was after the tax deadline, so I was very concerned that the funds would not be attributed to my 2005 SEP IRA. I had difficulties getting the correct department on the phone.

My 2005 SEP IRA was not funded until April 28, 2006, and my level of concern was much higher. I spoke to an account representative who assured me that even though they were late, my money would be applied to 2005’s tax year and I would get April 7’s price for the investment. My account information online confirmed this.

Fast forward to January 2007. I received my received my tax forms from TIAA-Cref which indicated my SEP applied to the 2006 tax year. I did eventually have this issue resolved, but it surfaced only one week after I reported that thousands of people were having problems with TIAA-Cref. Customers could not access their money, didn’t receive their payments, and couldn’t get in touch with any customer service representative who could fix the problems.

The company acknowledged the problems and attributed the mishaps to implementation of a new computer system. This excuse carried on as the problems did for at least a year, with updated in March and June 2007. Even today, visitors are still voicing their concerns with TIAA-Cref in these comments this year.

Most people’s problems were a lot more frustrating than mine, involving restricted access to money and missing payments from the company. Although I think it may be too late, Neil Wollman, an author who has been following TIAA-Cref’s activities as a socially responsible company over the past twenty-five years, is looking to speak up for consumers at the company’s annual meeting later this month.

If you are currently having issues with TIAA-Cref that you have not been able to resolve by going through the normal channels, please let me know by commenting here using an email address where you can be reached or email me directly at flexo at this domain name. I will pass your information along to Mr. Wollman who will speak to the board of directors on your behalf.

The Consumerism Commentary Podcast is in full swing with new episodes every Sunday. Listen and subscribe now!

Still Having Problems With TIAA-Cref? Tell Us Now



Read more of Still Having Problems With TIAA-Cref? Tell Us Now…



Thursday, July 2, 2009

Better World Books | College Textbooks 4 Cheap!

Buying and selling, cheap and easy

If you’ve ever taken college courses, you know that textbooks can be expensive. Depending upon the type of student loan, scholarship or grant you have, the expense for these massive tomes may or may not be covered. If you don’t have any help and you’re trying to pay your own way through college, good luck.

Payday loans and other short term loans aren’t likely to help you with the bill for a full semester’s tuition, but they can make a difference when it comes to buying textbooks in a hurry. Just make sure that you’re shopping for the best deal possible. Check out a place like Better World Books.

Taking the books campuses won’t

Stephanie Elam reports for CNN that Better World Books is a solution for both those searching for discounted college textbooks and those looking to unload textbooks, particularly those school bookstores won’t buy back. Xavier Helgesen, Kreece Fuchs and Jeff Kurtzman, the team that founded Better World Books, are prepared to make your textbook buying and selling experience as painless as possible.

“We just thought, like, wow, there are all these books out there that the bookstores are just saying, ‘No, I don’t want it,’ but there’s totally value in those books,” Helgesen said. “You just gotta get them efficiently up on the Internet and then someone will buy them.” ... click here to read the rest of the article titled "Better World Books | College Textbooks 4 Cheap!"

Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Alexis Argüello Found Dead | Suicide Suspected

The heart of a champion

Sadly, recent weeks have brought what seems like a flood of celebrity deaths to the public eye. Ed McMahon, Farrah Fawcett, Michael Jackson, Billy Mays - and the list goes on. Understand that death comes to the human race every day of the year; it just seems like more is occurring of late because these deaths make the headlines rather than just the obituaries. I don’t think it’s a matter of fairness. No, it is simply the way the public interest works. People die, and those who remain take pay day loans for quick cash to fund the funerals and memorials.

Some people in life are fighters. In the case of Nicaraguan Alexis Argüello, this was literally true. Born in 1952, this Hall of Fame boxer became the sixth man to hold the title belt in three separate weight classes - featherweight, super featherweight and lightweight. He was known at “The Explosive Thin Man.” Now Alexis Argüello, former mayor of Managua, Nicaragua, is dead. He was 57 years old.

Shot to the heart

Filadelfo Aleman reports for the Associated Press that the three-time world boxing champion was discovered dead in his Nicaragua home. The news was initially reported by his Sandinista Party’s Radio Ya. Interestingly, Argüello took issue with the Sandinistas during the 1980s after the party had gobbled up his property and bank accounts. Perhaps the best way to beat them is truly to join them. Sure, the opposing party made claims that Argüello’s election stemmed from a fraudulent vote, but it was never proven. Considering that Argüello held the Nicaraguan flag during the opening ceremonies of a recent Olympic Games, he may just have been popular with the Nicaraguan people. ... click here to read the rest of the article titled "Alexis Argüello Found Dead | Suicide Suspec ted"